pseudo-chinese@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "伪中国语（偽中国語）趣味翻译。将中文翻译为纯汉字日式表达——用和式词汇替换、日语SOV语序、日式婉转/夸张风格、日本汉字字形。当用户要求「伪中国语」「偽中国語」「日式汉字翻译」「假中文」或要求把中文转成伪中国语风格时触发。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,290 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cantoneyes: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.