Skills/ClawHub/property-dispute

property-dispute@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "[Property] 物业纠纷全流程维权助手。业主描述物业问题(电梯故障/漏水/物业费涨价/账目不透明/公共收益被侵占/服务不达标等),自动完成权利评估-法律条款速查-升级流程导航-投诉文件生成-谈判脚本输出-公共税务审计6大阶段分析,生成交互式HTML可视化维权报告。覆盖民法典物权编/物业服务合同/侵权责任、物..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher bettermen · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 571Last detonated 38 h ago
$clawhub install property-dispute
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 907 lines in 6 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈922 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.