Skills/ClawHub/pricing

pricing@1.0.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Sets, tests, and changes prices: value metric, tier packaging, discounts, price increases, and willingness-to-pay research. Use when deciding what to charge for a new product, when nobody knows what it is worth, when a raise is overdue but churn is feared, when every deal closes at a discount, when the free plan never converts, when a competitor undercuts, when choosing per-seat versus usage-based versus flat, when designing a pricing page, when quoting an enterprise deal or a day rate, when entering a new country or currency, or when setting a marketplace take rate. Covers Van Westendorp and conjoint research, grandfathering, annual prepay maths, price tests, and auto-renewal and price-display rules. Not for consumer buying decisions (`price`), indie launch sequencing and revenue mix (`monetize`), building the billing system (`billing`), CAC and LTV decomposition (`unit-economics`), or company financial models (`cfo`)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ivangdavila · publishing for 275 daysInstalls 3,107Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

LOW
Rule modification attemptprice-increase.md:22 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions · informational: not an instruction fileFrom SKILL.md Rule 2: a rise of `x` at contribution margin `m` survives a volume loss of `x / (m + x)`.Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
LOW
Refusal suppressionprice-increase.md:58 · Refusal suppression — attempting to prevent safety responses · informational: not an instruction file- **Do not apologize and do not over-explain.** A raise justified by your costs is about you; a raise justified by what shipped since the last one is about them. Neither needs three paragraphs.Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈7,300 tok
1 file · 19 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ivangdavila: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim ivangdavilaPropose a patch to the maintainer