Skills/ClawHub/policy-to-action

policy-to-action@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "政策翻译官 —— 官话 → 人话 → 行动。把复杂政策条文转化为「能不能用、能省多少、该怎么做」的标准化报告,企业/个人通用,双输出 HTML + 可转发文本总览。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhouq2039-lang · publishing for 107 daysInstalls 472Last detonated 5d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,152 lines in 7 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,274 tok
1 file · 7 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhouq2039-lang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhouq2039-langPropose a patch to the maintainer