pmo-talk-skills@0.1.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "把项目管理场景中的对话、聊天记录、邮件、会议纪要整理成有理有据的回怼与说服话术。自动诊断冲突场景，从7大沟通框架（PREP / RIDE / LEAPS / FFC / 30秒电梯演讲 / STAR / SCQA）中选型，生成可直接发送或说出的话术，附强硬备用版与对方反扑预案。Use whenever the user says 回怼、怼回去、怼他、怎么反驳、怎么回复、帮我回、说服对方、应对质疑、争取资源或预算、被甩锅、被甲方/领导/外包/跨部门施压，或 push back / persuade stakeholders——即使没有明说要用沟通框架。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 581 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim forrestneo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.