Skills/ClawHub/playlet-gzh-feed

playlet-gzh-feed@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "短剧-公众号信息源 — 每日扫描公众号短剧爆款文章,按阅读量筛选热门内容,智能聚类题材方向后生成包含封面图、互动数据与创作洞察的HTML日报。支持按题材(穿越/霸总/重生等)、公众号、时间范围定向查询。⚠️数据每日15:00更新前一天数据,目标日期无数据时必须先告知用户并等待确认后才能调用接口,禁止自动获取。当用..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher redfox-data · publishing for 144 daysInstalls 736Last detonated 43 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 2,480 lines in 8 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,179 tok
1 file · 8 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim redfox-data: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim redfox-dataPropose a patch to the maintainer