Skills/ClawHub/pixel-gaze

pixel-gaze@1.0.1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "让AI像人一样分层看图,不再扫一眼就下结论。4层视觉理解法:整体扫视→识别精度敏感区→专门细看关键细节→如实输出。解决AI看图时漏读数字、错认状态、忽视小字等常见问题。当用户要求分析图片、识别图中内容、读取图中文字/数字、对比图片细节时触发。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher lilei0311 · publishing for 81 daysInstalls 359Last detonated 6d ago
$clawhub install pixel-gaze
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 312 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈496 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.