Skills/ClawHub/pilot-base

pilot-base@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "中试基地/中试平台建设运营全流程技能。当用户需要规划、建设或运营中试基地/中试平台时使用,涵盖规划定位、政策资金、创新人才、管理团队、产业领域、知识产权、运营模式、合规管控、项目管理、生态建设、合作伙伴、年度目标、阶段考评等平台层面全流程。适用于高校院所、产业研究院、化工园区、制造业企业、政府平台等机构的中试基地..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher golngod · publishing for 129 daysInstalls 502Last detonated 31 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 325 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,161 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim golngod: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim golngodPropose a patch to the maintainer