Skills/ClawHub/pet-food-compare

pet-food-compare@1.0.1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "用于公正、中立地对比线上在售的狗粮、猫粮产品信息。当用户正在挑选、对比、纠结于几款狗粮或猫粮,给出产品名、商品链接或包装图,希望查证成分、价格、产地、营养指标、代工厂等信息,或希望生成对比表时,必须使用本 skill。典型触发场景包括"帮我看看这两款猫粮"、"XX 和 YY 比怎么样"、"这几个狗粮给我对比一下"、"我发了几个链接,你帮我查一下"。本 skill 只做中立信息收集、归纳与对比,绝不替用户做推荐决策。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher chenchen91 · publishing for 128 daysInstalls 1,380Last detonated 3d ago
$clawhub install pet-food-compare
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 423 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,021 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.