pet-food-compare-2@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "用于公正、中立地对比线上在售的狗粮、猫粮产品信息。当用户正在挑选、对比、纠结于几款狗粮或猫粮，给出产品名、商品链接或包装图，希望查证成分、价格、产地、营养指标、代工厂等信息，或希望生成对比表时，必须使用本 skill。典型触发场景包括"帮我看看这两款猫粮"、"XX 和 YY 比怎么样"、"这几个狗粮给我对比一下"..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 423 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenchen91: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.