patron-ig-f100k@1.0.3
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Módulo del Autopilot F100K para correr cada lunes: trae los videos de la cuenta de Instagram de la usuaria de los últimos 7 días (Composio o Apify), transcribe con Supadata si hay llave, calcula la mediana de views/likes/comentarios, clasifica videos virales (>1.5x mediana) y negativos (<0.7x), extrae qué funcionó y qué no, y actualiza cerebro/memoria/patterns_ig_<handle>.md para que la guionización aprenda semana a semana. Usar cuando alguien diga: "analiza mis patrones de la semana", "qué patrones detectaste", "actualiza mi memoria de patrones IG", "qué me funcionó esta semana", o cuando la automatización semanal lo invoque." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 307 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim formula100k: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.