paper-report@2.1.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Convert academic papers into structured Chinese reading reports with original figures. Supports arXiv HTML and local PDF inputs. For arXiv links, HTML mode is preferred for textual accuracy. Use when the user asks to summarize, read, analyze, or create a reading report for an academic paper." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Latin word with Cyrillic or Greek look-alike letters (homoglyph). Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
ΣcolsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.No other findings across 2,045 lines in 14 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim x-lixu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.