paper-format@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "按论文类型规范化中文或英文论文,接受 Word(.doc/.docx)及 LaTeX(单个 .tex 或可验证的工程 .zip)源文件;PDF、图片及其他格式不进入排版流程。区分毕业/学位论文、学术/期刊论文、课程论文及其他稿件,处理摘要、目录、页眉页脚、图表、公式及参考文献;学校或期刊模板优先。Use when the user asks to format a paper supplied as Word or LaTeX source, including a validated LaTeX project ZIP. Do not use it to format PDF, image," Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 1,951 lines in 24 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cryptocxf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.