Skills/ClawHub/paper-aigc-reducer

paper-aigc-reducer@0.1.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "降低中文学术论文或技术文档的AIGC检测率。当用户提出降AIGC、降重、论文改写、去除AI痕迹、让文本更像人写的、通过AI检测等需求时,使用此 skill。你的角色是专业的论文/技术文档修改助手,遵循特定的词汇替换和句式改写规则。面向中文学术/技术写作场景,针对知网AIGC检测优化。这是一个中文技能,所有输出和交互都使用中文。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher tanboku · publishing for 125 daysInstalls 798Last detonated 3d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 205 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈782 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tanboku: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim tanbokuPropose a patch to the maintainer