Skills/ClawHub/package

package@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Agent instruction quality audit — lint SKILL.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md files, tool definitions, system prompts, and agent configs with the deterministic LintLang CLI. Runs on request when the user names a file. Catches ambiguous tool descriptions, missing stop conditions, schema/description mismatches, and prompts embedded in Python. Zero-LLM static analysis; no model calls and no network calls during a scan. Not for general code review or prose documentation." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher roli-lpci · joined 6 days agoInstalls 105Last detonated 3d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 302 lines in 3 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim roli-lpci: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim roli-lpci