origin-office@1.1.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "原生文档（docx/pptx）→ 可验证的对象——转换即语义事务。零依赖解析 docx 的章/条/段落/表格（合并单元格展开、勾选框保留）与 pptx 的幻灯片/形状/表格（占位符类型、gridSpan 合并），每处结构一个对象建成本象包，SHA-256 结构指纹入库，verify 可验证「包与源文件一致」（篡改即检出）。行业火力全在 PDF 扫描件（OCR 有物理误差），原生电子文档的无损结构化没人认真做——本象做「把字变成可验证状态的对象」。当需要把 docx/pptx 转成 AI 可锚定、可验证的结构，或做文档版本追踪/条款级引用时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 234 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dongsheng123132: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.