Skills/ClawHub/optimize-skill-md-redfox

optimize-skill-md-redfox@1.0.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "按照《Skills MD 标准书写格式》对现有 SKILL.md 进行结构化优化,提升描述质量、章节组织、内容简洁度和格式规范性。当用户需要优化、改进或标准化 SKILL.md 文件时使用。触发词:优化SKILL.md、改进skill、标准化skill格式、skill格式检查、skill优化。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher yuanyi-github · publishing for 157 daysInstalls 624Last detonated 15 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 694 lines in 6 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,050 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yuanyi-github: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim yuanyi-githubPropose a patch to the maintainer