opmc-industry-analysis@4.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "OPC行业深度分析技能：10维度系统化行业分析框架（PEST/市场规模/产业链/竞争格局/技术路线/客户画像/客单价量本利/合规风险/风险变化预期/结论建议），内置50+权威数据源与强制引用规范，输出Word文档+专业图表。当用户提到行业分析、赛道分析、市场研究、产业分析、行业调研、市场规模、行业报告时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 931 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim golngod: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.