opmc-expert-committee@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "OPC专家委员会知识蒸馏技能，汇聚11位全球顶级专家的思维框架，提供多维度专业决策支持。当用户需要专家视角、专家委员会、专业决策支持、多角度分析、战略研讨、风险评估、商业模式设计、技术架构规划、品牌定位、合规审查、产品创新、营销策略、文案创意、设计美学等场景时使用。触发关键词：专家、专家委员会、凯文凯利、吴晓波、..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 3,979 lines in 16 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim golngod: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.