openclaw-skill-intelligence-ingestion@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Auto-analyze URLs/info for OpenClaw strategic value, classify, create Obsidian notes, update memory. Use when user shares a URL, article, tweet, or any exter..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
2. **If strategic value is 🔴 Critical**: Also update `MEMORY.md` (Pending Work or Active Bottleneck)Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.No other findings across 459 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim 2233admin: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.