openclaw-plus@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Multi-capability dev skill for chained workflows involving Python execution, package management, git, HTTP requests, file operations, process management, sub..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 59/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Credential pass-through configuration. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
- **Sub-agents:** Don't pass secrets in the task string — inject them via environment variables instead.Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.- Always kill background processes when done — don't leave orphansFix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell."prompt": "Create a temp file 'temp_output.txt', write some content to it, move it to 'final/output.txt', then verify the original is gone.",Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.file_ops("move", "temp_output.csv", dest="final/output.csv")Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why."prompt": "Start a long-running background process (e.g. a simple HTTP server), verify it's running, then kill it and confirm it's stopped.",Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.branch_result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.- System packages need sudo accessFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
21 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim shindo957-official: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Credential pass-through configuration≈ +4 on the totalStop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
- Process kill command≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalPut hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.