Skills/ClawHub/nutrition

nutrition@1.0.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Closes micronutrient gaps and raises diet quality: vitamins, minerals, fiber, supplements, and food-drug interactions. Use when the user asks if they get enough iron, B12, vitamin D, magnesium, calcium, zinc, folate, iodine, potassium, or omega-3, reports fatigue, hair loss, cramps, tingling, or mouth sores, brings blood work to read (ferritin, 25-OH D, homocysteine), builds or prunes a supplement stack with doses, forms, and upper limits, checks a food or supplement against a medication, needs the gaps of a vegan, vegetarian, keto, gluten-free, low-FODMAP, DASH, or Mediterranean diet, eats for pregnancy, older age, celiac, IBD, kidney disease, or bariatric surgery, wants more fiber or less ultra-processed food and sodium, or reads a label's %DV, NRV, or ingredients. Not for calorie and macro counting (`calories`, `dietitian`), meal plans and recipes (`meal-planner`, `meals`), food logging or eating habits (`food`, `nutritionist`), hydration (`water`), or fasting windows (`fasting`)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ivangdavila · publishing for 275 daysInstalls 3,756Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

LOW
Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction filessafety.md:109 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file… A flag raised and forgotten gets re-raised as a recommendation next month. **Write in the same turn**: one line in `## Notes` of `~/Clawic/data/nutrition/memory.md` — the date, the signal, what was declined, and what was recommended inste…Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
LOW
Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction filesmicronutrients.md:115 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file… iodization coverage | **After establishing or revising a nutrient's status**, write its row to `## Nutrient Status` in `~/Clawic/data/nutrition/memory.md` with the intake estimate, the target, the status, and the evidence it rests on…Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈7,732 tok
1 file · 18 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ivangdavila: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim ivangdavilaPropose a patch to the maintainer