novel-writer-team@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "多Agent协作的小说创作系统。当用户想写小说、创作故事、写网文、写网络小说、写短篇/中篇/长篇小说时使用此技能。即使用户只是模糊地说"我有个想法想写下来"、"帮我构思一个故事"、"想写个XX类型的小说"，也应该触发。支持起点中文网、番茄小说、晋江文学城、知乎盐选、豆瓣阅读5大平台风格适配。8个专业角色协作，覆盖..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,077 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim 156554395: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.