novel-craft@1.2.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "长篇小说（网文/连载）全流程创作引擎，核心解决三大痛点： 1. 超长上下文逻辑一致性——设定矛盾、伏笔遗忘、时间线错乱 2. 大纲修改涟漪传播——改一处自动识别受影响章节并全自动重写 3. 持续连载支持——跨session断点续写，上下文从文件恢复 核心模块： - 大纲管理器：卷→章→节→场景四级大纲，版本追踪..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,227 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gongsunyanming: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.