notion-personal-space-audit@1.0.5
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Audit a personal Notion hub and its nested pages and databases: identify mixed content types, empty placeholders, weak navigation, and sensitivity-boundary problems, then produce a practical information-architecture redesign and migration map. Read-only by default — it never modifies Notion content without explicit authorization. 中文摘要：审计个人 Notion 空间及其嵌套页面与数据库，识别混合内容类型、空占位记录、 弱导航与敏感边界问题，产出信息架构重设计与迁移方案。默认只读。触发词：Notion 空间 整理、Notion 页面审计、信息架构重构、数据库迁移方案." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 194 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim haiyangchenbj: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.