Skills/ClawHub/next-from-knowledge

next-from-knowledge@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Knowledge-to-action skill that turns notes, research, meeting summaries, documents, and knowledge graph outputs into the next action, decision, plan, or expe..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher harrylabsj · publishing for 251 daysInstalls 813Last detonated 12 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,382 lines in 13 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,871 tok
1 file · 13 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim harrylabsj: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim harrylabsjPropose a patch to the maintainer