neon-auth@1.0.1
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Add authentication to a new app. Use for "add auth", "add login", Neon Auth (Managed Better Auth), identity routing, sign-up, sign-in, password reset, email OTP, magic links, organizations, phone OTP, OAuth, OAuth server for MCP or third-party OAuth clients, passkeys, MFA, trusted domains, invalid domain, and @neon/auth. No existing identity: default to Managed Better Auth. Keep working Better Auth, Clerk, Supabase Auth, or another IdP. User asked to migrate from Supabase Auth: Managed Better Auth. A required plugin outside Managed support: self-managed Better Auth on a Neon Function or the existing app host. Also use for auth APIs in @neon/neon-js." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 415 lines in 4 files.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim andrelandgraf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.