Skills/ClawHub/nanny-assistant

nanny-assistant@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "🤱 月嫂全流程管理助手。覆盖新生儿护理/产妇护理/月子餐管理/健康监测/用药管理/每日工作台/护理日志/知识库/家属报告/下户交接10大模块，支持28天产后周期全覆盖，生成交互式HTML可视化看板。适用月嫂上户服务、月子中心、母婴护理团队等场景。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher bettermen · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 535Last detonated 40 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,377 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈584 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim bettermenPropose a patch to the maintainer