namingexpert@0.1.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "专业级命名创意引擎「灵犀取名官」，为品牌、产品、公司、人名、宠物、IP、项目等场景提供跨文化、多语言、高适配的名称方案。当用户需要取名、起名、命名、改名字、想名字、品牌取名、产品命名、公司取名、英文名、宝宝取名、宠物取名、网名、笔名、艺名时，使用此技能。即使用户只是提到"帮我想个名字"、"取个好名"等模糊表述，也..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 176 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qomob: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.