Skills/ClawHub/my-skill-hub

my-skill-hub@0.1.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "涵盖行业周期、商业模式、护城河动态、业务结构、同业对比（≥3家）、近5年财务趋势、财务风格、管理层治理、资本配置、再投资潜力、绝对估值（DCF）、估值陷阱检查、催化剂、安全边际、核心风险、情景概率化等模块，要求最新年报季报数据，多图表可视化，输出HTML报告。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher xiangbow2004 · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 1,059Last detonated 22 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 402 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,347 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim xiangbow2004: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim xiangbow2004Propose a patch to the maintainer