my-coffee@0.8.4
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Use when users ask to order Luckin Coffee, search Luckin stores/products, query pickup code/order status, cancel a Luckin order, or mention 瑞幸、luckin、咖啡、拿铁、美..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
- 写入 token 前确保目录存在(`mkdir -p ~/.my-coffee`);写入后建议限制权限(如 `chmod 600 ~/.my-coffee/LUCKIN_MCP_TOKEN`)。Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.No other findings across 536 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim luckin: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File permission modification command≈ +2 on the totalRequest the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.