multica-sdd-workflow@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "SDD + Multica 多智能体开发工作流。当用户提到"新建任务"、"发布给 multica"、"创建小队"、 "分配 issue"、"开始新功能"、"组建小队执行"、"按 SDD 流程"、"新增功能"、"功能更新"时触发。 覆盖从 SDD 规范文档编写、multica 小队创建、Issue 发布执行，到完成..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files; Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
| 禁止 `git push`、`git add .` | AGENTS.md |Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.git add specs/<NNN>-<feature>/tasks.md CLAUDE.mdFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim denghuayuan: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.