Skills/ClawHub/multi-agent-team

multi-agent-team@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "多智能体协作（整合与进阶·元能力）。给定一项任务/一个待决问题，自动完成： 角色分工(提议者/批判者/事实核查/综合裁决) → 任务派发 → 多视角作答 → 交叉验证(reason-verify) → 投票聚合/辩论择优 → 输出带置信度的共识结论。 对标一线大模型智能体的「多 agent 辩论/自一致性」能力，且把每个 agent 的产出 都过一遍可靠自验证、按可靠度加权投票。当复杂决策需要多视角、且要 抑制单点幻觉时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qq435912743 · publishing for 88 daysInstalls 145Last detonated 12 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/team.py:32 · Python subprocess execution detectedr = subprocess.run([sys.executable, RV, "reason", "--question", "任务立场核查",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 385 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈321 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qq435912743: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim qq435912743Propose a patch to the maintainer