mock-interview@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "扮演面试官陪求职者做模拟面试练习。当用户说"帮我模拟面试""陪我练面试""模拟一下 XX 岗位的面试""给我出几道面试题练练""我想练习面试回答",或提供了目标岗位和自己的经历希望进行问答演练时触发。本技能基于用户提供的岗位和经历做结构化追问(每轮一个问题、连续多轮),练习结束后给出复盘评分与改进建议。即使用户没..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Hidden zero-width characters detected. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
metadata: {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🧑💼"}}Fix: Keep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.No other findings across 226 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim shutongzhou1222: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Hidden zero-width characters detected≈ +4 on the totalKeep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.