Skills/ClawHub/mimo-skill-selector

mimo-skill-selector@1.3.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "技能太多不知道该用哪个,每次都要翻半天?本技能根据用户需求智能匹配最合适的已安装技能。关键词+语义双重匹配,输出Top3推荐+理由+适用场景,不再试错浪费时间。 触发词:选技能、用哪个技能、技能推荐、技能匹配、技能选择、该用什么、帮我选技能 排除:技能创建(用skill_builder)、技能搜索安装(用skil..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qqyougitcom · publishing for 149 daysInstalls 599Last detonated 12 h ago
$clawhub install mimo-skill-selector
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 131 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈305 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.