mimo-prompt-engineering-expert@1.4.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "AI回答总是不够好？问题大概率出在你的提问方式。不是给你模板死记硬背，而是教你Role-Task-Format-CoT四大核心维度的设计原理，让你针对任何模型、任何场景都能写出高质量prompt。覆盖GPT/Claude/Gemini/国产大模型，掌握底层原理一通百通。附Prompt诊断修复表，12种常见问题一键..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,058 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qqyougitcom: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.