Skills/ClawHub/mimo-doubt-driven-development

mimo-doubt-driven-development@2.0.1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "对每个非平凡决策进行对抗性审查,防止Agent过度自信导致的错误。 当正确性比速度更重要时、在陌生领域工作时、高风险操作时触发。 触发场景:架构决策、非平凡代码提交、声称"这是安全的/可扩展的/符合规格的"、 不确定领域的工作、生产环境部署、数据迁移、不可逆操作。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qqyougitcom · publishing for 149 daysInstalls 548Last detonated 9 h ago
$clawhub install mimo-doubt-driven-development
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 241 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,052 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.