mimo-competitor-analysis@1.4.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "帮你拆解竞品的产品定位、功能差异、定价策略和用户口碑，输出结构化分析报告+定位图谱+SWOT交叉策略+行动路线图。6步深度分析框架，5大行业适配。 触发词：竞品分析、竞争对手分析、市场调研、产品对比、竞品调研、SWOT分析、商业分析、行业研究、对标分析、竞品监控、定价分析、竞争策略、波特五力、竞品报告 排除：技术..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 288 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qqyougitcom: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.