mimo-ai-engineering-workflow@1.3.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "用AI写代码一时爽，项目越写越乱火葬场？Superpowers方法论5道Gate卡住质量：设计没想清楚不准动手、没写测试不准提交。把「能跑就行」升级成工程级交付，让AI帮你写出可维护的代码。支持全栈项目（Web/移动端/API/数据）、团队协作规范、CI/CD集成指南。从需求到上线的完整工程化流水线，杜绝"AI生..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 623 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qqyougitcom: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.