memory-digest@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Generate human-readable weekly/monthly reports from an AI agent's memory corpus. Use when the user asks "what did my agent do this week", "generate a work report", "记忆周报", "述职报告", "weekly digest", "monthly summary of agent activity", or when a periodic review of agent work is wanted. Reads date-named daily memory logs and produces a digest with activity timeline, project momentum, open threads, and metric changes." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 533 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim thomaszhou22: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.