Skills/ClawHub/medical-device-postmarket

medical-device-postmarket@1.1.4

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "A practical playbook for post-market surveillance of medical devices, comparing reporting duties across the US, EU, China and Japan and turning them into checklists. It covers adverse event reporting, PSUR frequency, field safety corrective actions, recalls and PMCF follow-up. Use when you need to know what to report, to whom, and by when after a device is already on the market. 医疗器械上市后监管（Post-Market Surveillance, PMS）实操手册——中美欧日四市场上市后义务对照（不良事件报告、PSUR 定期安全报告、FSCA/召回现场安全纠正、PMCF 上市后临床跟踪）、各市场报告时限与流程清单（美国 21 CFR 803 致死 30 天/严重 90 天、欧盟 MDCG 2022-21 PSUR 频率、中国 2018 年 1 号令报告时限、日本 PMDA）、PMS 计划与 PSUR 撰写框架、监测-报告-纠正闭环落地，附零依赖本地工具一键查询义务对照、报告时限与生成 PMS/PSUR 框架。面向医械法规、质量与临床负责人，拿证后的持续合规一站理清。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · joined 10 days agoInstalls 475Last detonated 1 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/pms_quality_test.py:50 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/pms_quality_test.py:53 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/pms_quality_test.py:60 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/pms_quality_test.py:58 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/pms_quality_test.py:56 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,514 tok
1 file · 13 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
  3. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cellPropose a patch to the maintainer