mearl@2.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Use when/适用于以下三个场景:1) 需要登录态的请求 —— 复用浏览器已登录的 Cookie/签名调用接口(mtop/http 请求);2) 操作浏览器 —— 打开/切换/关闭标签页、点击、输入、滚动、按键、导航、上传文件、执行 JS、截图、页面快照等;3) 调试页面 —— 获取页面请求/控制台日志/埋点事件、查看与设置 mock、添加请求规则(重定向/改请求头)、获取 API schema、查看选中元素信息。通过统一的 mearl CLI 调用 Mearl 能力,兼容本地、CDP 直连与云端连接。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher f-loat · publishing for 110 daysInstalls 493Last detonated 4d ago
$clawhub install mearl
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 1,874 lines in 6 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,936 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.