Skills/ClawHub/mcp-server-audit

mcp-server-audit@1.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "MCP Server 配置安全审计器。把本机各宿主(Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / Windsurf / 项目级 .mcp.json)的 MCP server 配置集中采集,对每个 server 确定性标记风险形态 (shell 包装执行 / 包管理器拉取远端代码 / 凭据写进 URL / 明文 HTTP / 环境变量 暴露面 / 命令注入痕迹),再由 Agent 结合部署语境逐条做暴露面分析,输出分级清单 与加固建议。审查的是「配置给了 Agent 什么能力」,不是 server 的代码质量。 触发词: MCP 审计, MCP 安全, 检查 MCP 配置, MCP server 审查, mcp 配置体检, mcp 风险, mcp audit, mcp security review, check mcp servers, mcp config review, mcp server 检查, 审查工具权限。 激活条件: 用户给出 MCP 配置语境(要求检查/审计 MCP server、配置文件路径, 或询问某个 MCP server 是否安全);与 MCP 无关的通用安全审查不触发。 NOT for: Skill 质量评审(用 skill-review-pro)、代码质量评审(用 code-review-ProMax)、交付覆盖审计(用 delivery-spec-audit)、server 代码 漏洞挖掘(需要运行 server,本 skill 只读配置不执行任何 server)。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher z-zihan · publishing for 33 daysInstalls 98Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 68/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:87 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code- **P1 尽快**：`npx -y`/`uvx` 无版本 pin 的包运行器、明文 HTTP、shell 包装Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:210 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code- **P1 soon**: unversioned `npx -y`/`uvx`, plain HTTP, shell-wrapped commandFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,965 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

12 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim z-zihan: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim z-zihanPropose a patch to the maintainer