Skills/ClawHub/mckinsey-100y-knowledge-base

mckinsey-100y-knowledge-base@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "麦肯锡100年知识库 - 涵盖191篇精选内容，融合金字塔原理、结构化战略思维、麦肯锡工作法、写作与阅读方法论，以及麦肯锡全球行业洞察报告（金融、AI、消费、能源、汽车等）。支持知识检索、方法论指导、问题解决框架和行业趋势分析。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher yjkj999999 · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 591Last detonated 14 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,206 lines in 8 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,464 tok
1 file · 8 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yjkj999999: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim yjkj999999Propose a patch to the maintainer