lzy-tech-transfer-plan-generator@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "成果转化方案生成。当用户提到"技术怎么交易""许可还是转让还是入股""成果转化方案""作价入股怎么操作""技术转让方案""怎么给成果定价"或需要参考科技成果转化案例、借鉴高校院所转化模式时使用。运行时会自动检索内置41个典型案例库（北京31例+全国10例）作为参考依据，输出：转化模式决策（许可/转让/作价入股）、10维度评分、条款清单、税收影响、相似案例对标。本技能必须在使用前加载 references/case_library_guide.md 了解案例库结构。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 4,019 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lvjin1983: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.