long-task-runner@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Run long jobs; hand off new tasks with proven experience" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 68/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
proc=subprocess.run([a.ffmpeg,'-nostdin','-v','error','-xerror','-i',str(a.path.resolve()),'-f','null',os.devnull],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.proc=subprocess.run([a.ffprobe,'-v','error','-show_entries','format=duration:stream=codec_type,width,height',Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.p = subprocess.Popen(actual, cwd=cwd, env={**os.environ, **env}, stdin=subprocess.PIPE if job else subprocess.DEVNULL,Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.subprocess.run([sys.executable,str(here/'make_demo.py'),'--directory',str(d),'--seconds',str(a.seconds)],check=True,capture_output=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.child = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable,'-c',"import time; from pathlib import Path; time.sleep(4); Path('escaped-child.txt').write_text('escaped'); time.sleep(40)"])Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.proc=subprocess.run(cmd,capture_output=True,timeout=40)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.p=subprocess.run(cmd,capture_output=True,timeout=10)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.p = subprocess.run([sys.executable, str(RUNNER), *map(str,args)], capture_output=True, timeout=60)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.ps=[subprocess.Popen(args,stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stderr=subprocess.PIPE) for _ in range(3)]Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.return subprocess.call(sys.argv[3:], stdin=subprocess.DEVNULL)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.p = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, SCRIPT, "_worker", str(job), state["token"]],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
12 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dhzyw: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.