local-rag-builder@1.6.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "本地 RAG 系统搭建技能,支持环境检测修复、嵌入模型多源下载、5种切分策略 + GuardStack + 后处理 + 插件注册、多知识库管理 + 自动分类规则、可调 Prompt、Web 可视化配置 + 极客模式 + 模板管理" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 65/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.proc = subprocess.Popen(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.var name = prompt('\u8f93\u5165\u6a21\u677f\u540d\u79f0\uff08\u4f8b\u5982\uff1a\u201c\u6211\u7684\u6280\u672f\u6587\u6863\u914d\u7f6e\u201d\uff09:');Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.<button class="btn btn-danger" onclick="if(confirm('\u786e\u5b9a\u91cd\u7f6e\u6240\u6709\u914d\u7f6e\uff1f'))resetAll()">🗑️ \u91cd\u7f6e\u914d\u7f6e</button>Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.proc = subprocess.Popen(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.if(d.success) {{ toast('\u6a21\u677f\u5df2\u4fdd\u5b58\uff1a'+name); refreshGeekTemplates(); }}Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.result = subprocess.run(Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.var label = prompt('\u8f93\u5165\u6a21\u677f\u63cf\u8ff0\uff08\u53ef\u7a7a\uff09:') || name;Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.if(!confirm('\u786e\u5b9a\u52a0\u8f7d\u6a21\u677f "'+name+'" \u5e76\u8986\u76d6\u5f53\u524d\u914d\u7f6e\uff1f')) return;Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
15 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ldxs001: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
- Unicode escape sequence detected≈ +2 on the totalPut hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.