Skills/ClawHub/local-industrial-fund-analysis-writer

local-industrial-fund-analysis-writer@1.1.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "地方产业基金投资分析写作专家。面向专业公众号内容生产，产出三类内容：产业投资观察周报、地方产业投资案例分析、产业投资专业文章。受众为地方产业招商人员、政府引导基金/国资GP、投委等专业读者，对标专业公众号（招商引资内参/清科·投资界/母基金研究中心等）深度。内化专业6标尺 + 五层分析（政府层为重点）+ 去AI味写作。自包含，不调用外部专家，不依赖其代码/配置。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher perrykono-debug · joined 1 days agoInstalls 342Last detonated 8 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 202 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,145 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim perrykono-debug: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim perrykono-debugPropose a patch to the maintainer