ljh-jiaoben@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "带货脚本评审器。用户贴脚本全文，按七步说服链逐段核对，指出缺哪步、哪句没配画面、表达形式和内核哪层出问题。 触发方式：/ljh-jiaoben、「帮我评审一下这个带货脚本」「这个脚本为什么转化不好」「看看我这个口播稿哪里有问题」 Selling script reviewer. Paste the full script, get a step-by-step check against the seven-step persuasion chain, with missing steps and unmatched visuals flagged. Trigger: /ljh-jiaoben, "review this selling script", "why isn't this script converting", "check my voiceover script" 不要在评审论文、公文、影视剧本等非带货内容时自动触发。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 323 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim handsomeng: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.