ljh-daren@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "达人选号诊断器，用六维决策表初筛达人账号，跑反作弊三查，给出可谈/压价谈/放弃的合作建议。 触发方式：/ljh-daren、「帮我看看这个达人能不能投」「这个账号数据是不是刷的」「这个号值不值得投」「达人报价合不合理」「怎么判断这个号是不是真流量」 Influencer account diagnosis tool. Screens accounts against a six-dimension scorecard and runs a three-part anti-fraud check to output a partner/negotiate/pass recommendation. Trigger: /ljh-daren, "should I book this influencer", "is this account's data fake" 评价明星艺人形象或核实合作伙伴征信之类的非达人投放场景，不要自动触发。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 353 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim handsomeng: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.